Tuesday, 19 April 2022

Toxic Disinformation

 

Pic courtesy The Guardian

The other day, gentle reader, I worked out that I have participated (or attempted to participate) in twenty federal elections since 1969.

The first one in 1969 was notable in that whilst at age 21 I was old enough to vote in that election I never did, as I was refused leave from Canungra Jungle Training Centre to do so. I was threatened with a charge of being AWOL if I left the base to vote.

This was particularly frustrating as I was training to fight (in peacetime) in South Vietnam as a conscript, and felt I was entitled to have a say in my immediate future. Labor policy at the time was to abolish conscription. I did end up in Vietnam, and had to wait until 1972 to see that policy implemented.

Through all those elections, I have never observed such an avalanche of disinformation about the forthcoming ballot that I'm observing now, most of it emanating from the lunatic fringe of social media, which has oozed across the Pacific.

It has its origin in Donald Trump's big lie, and has been promoted by every disaffected group that coalesced during the pandemic and government attempts, through the health system, to manage it.

The Australian Electoral Commission has found it necessary to develop a web page specifying many of those slabs of disinformation and fact checking them.

For example, these are some of the dark whispers doing the rounds -

There will be two federal elections in 2022 including the People's non-corporate commonwealth election.

And

Dominion voting machines will be used and will be rigged to favour one of the major political parties.

And

Postal voting is not secure and people should deregister.

The ludicrous nature of this disinformation should make it completely apparent to anyone with any knowledge of this country's electoral system that it is toxic nonsense, but there are those who actually believe it.

This Youtube video explains pretty clearly (albeit with a tongue-in cheek approach) why our system is the best in the world.

Democracy is an exercise in participation. In this country it is encouraged. 

That's important. I remember very well what happened in 1969.



   

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Encouraged" should be compulsory.

1735099 said...

You're wrong there. All you have to do is front up and have your name marked on the electoral roll. Whether you actually vote is neither here nor there, so long as you drop the ballot in the box.

Anonymous said...

It is known as donkey voting, Robert. I thought you, of all people, would understand that.
The Electoral Commission accepts it as having complied with your requirement under compulsory voting rules. Whether you consider not marking the paper voting or not voting matters not.
What do you call someone with Labor beliefs that votes Greens?

1735099 said...

"Donkey voting" is starting at the top of the ballot and working down. That's why candidates prefer to get the top position on the paper in the draw. As far as I'm concerned, you'd have to be a real donkey not to vote at all, yet there are some anti-democratic individuals who advocate that.
By the way, the notion of rusted on voters with Labor (or Liberal) beliefs went the way of stove pipe pants in the sixties.
That's why the independents are developing an ever increasing following. After all, the Westminster system is based on voting for a candidate, not a party.

Birds of a Feather

George Santos (Courtesy Wikipedia) Troy Thompson (Courtesy Townsville Bulletin)   Today, gentle reader, I'm comparing two individuals wh...