Friday 9 December 2022

The Carmila Cyclone

Photo courtesy Courier Mail

On March 10th, 1950, I was a three year old living in Carmila with my mother and father (who was principal of the school), and my sixteen month-old brother. 

Dad had been principal (or head teacher as it was called then) since the beginning of 1948. We lived in a solidly built school residence and there was extensive bushland surrounding the school.

On the evening before the cyclone struck, the wind had built up swiftly and rain squalls became more frequent. It was a Thursday, and as the evening came on, the phone began to ring incessantly, as dad had a barometer and local people were phoning (on the party line as it was then) asking about the readings. They were dropping quickly, and I remember dad saying "The bottom's going to drop out of the bloody thing if this keeps up".

Back then, there was no forecasting through radar imaging, and nobody really knew where the cyclone was.  

By midnight, the wind was howling, and the house began to shake with the walls moving in and out. We sheltered under a very large and heavy dining room table and said the rosary. I don't recall being especially frightened, thinking that it was all a bit of a novelty. Mum and dad obviously kept us calm, and if they were frightened were hiding it well. At about three in the morning, the roof began to peel off, and according to a case study written by Jeff Callaghan, (a severe weather forecaster from the bureau of Meteorology), the winds peaked between 3.30 and 4.15 am and the eye passed over at about this time. I remember the howling wind returning from a different direction.

The school in the fifties

Over the sound of the wind, you could hear objects striking the walls of the house, although I don't know exactly what they were. Neighbours who lived about 300 meters away made their way to the school residence, miraculously dodging corrugated iron and assorted debris, and joined us in the kitchen. By sunrise, the wind had dropped and we were able to see the aftermath. My little brother had recently learned to ride his tricycle and charged it along the verandah which was covered with puddles of water, proclaiming "This is the beach!"

I remember that you could see for kilometres, as the trees that hadn't been uprooted had been stripped of foliage, and there were dead and injured possums and koalas scattered around. A sheet of corrugated iron from the residence had been blown into the school fence which had cut two grooves 30 cm long from the fence wire in the sheet. That gave us some idea of the power of the wind. The only time I have seen anything resembling this was during a visit to the Cyclone Tracy museum in Darwin in 2015. 

What we didn't know, and was hidden from us, was that a seventeen year-old girl had been killed by a falling tree, and four other people injured. (Carmila had a population of about four hundred in 1950). Reports at the time indicated that only eight buildings were left standing, one was the school residence, and another the school building. We moved into the school building because it wasn't as badly damaged as the residence, and stayed put for two weeks as the residence was made habitable.  

Unfortunately, one of the members of the family that had moved in with us the night of the cyclone came down with tuberculosis. Back then, any bedclothes used in a house where tuberculosis had been detected had to be destroyed. I remember mum piling the sheets and blankets into the base of the copper used to boil clothes, and setting fire to them. My mother's distress, and the smell of the burning bedclothes remain one of my most vivid memories.

Eventually, life began to return to normal with the aid of special reconstruction trains sent with materials and tradesmen down the rail line from Mackay.   

This particular cyclone was especially destructive as it zigzagged backwards and forwards between the coast and the mainland, causing drownings in Mareeba and Innisfail before wrecking Carmila. 

As far as I know, it wasn't given a name, and is known in the record as the Carmila Cyclone.

Here is Jeff Callaghan's report. 

Here is a report from the Rockhampton Morning Bulletin of 13th March 1950.

Here is a report from the Townsville Daily Bulletin of 13th March 1950, where dad gets a mention.


Comments closed.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Truly remarkable memory for a 2 3/4 year old child. Another work of fiction, or an historical piece based on the memories of others and without quotes?

Anonymous said...

I would suggest that Dad may have been known as Headmaster, unless of course rural school managers were lesser in rank of those in cities and not considered a principal.

headmaster is a synonym of headteacher.

As nouns the difference between headteacher and headmaster is that headteacher is the most senior teacher in a school while headmaster is a male school principal.

1735099 said...

I remember parts of it vividly, especially the house walls flexing and the smell of the burning bedclothes. The meteorological details are based on the case study and the news reports linked. The "others" are my parents who died years ago.

1735099 said...

"Headmaster" is a term still used only in private schools in Australia, and went out with button up boots everywhere else. It is/was in common use in the UK, but far less here. Dad was known as "Headteacher", and would have been very surprised to be called anything else. He was certainly not a "rural school manager", and bush headteachers were equal in every respect to their urban counterparts, but had to be more resourceful. He was a leader, not a manager, both in his school, and his community. The term "manager" is derived from a French term describing a person who looks after the horses. If you're really interested in the terminology, you can follow this link, but it's hugely irrelevant in this account -https://www.funtrivia.com/askft/Question67349.html

Anonymous said...

Having seen how you "moderate" comments, Robby. I would put money on the assumption that you hate what Musk is doing to Twatter. You have been following the old Twatter playbook closely.

1735099 said...

You haven't seen how I "moderate" comments. What you claim I do is an assumption, not based on anything except your bias. Your other assumption is also ill founded. I don't "hate" Twitter (or Musk) for that matter, or care what he does with the platform. Musk is driven only by the almighty dollar.

Anonymous said...

I have seen how you moderate. If a comment with sound, factual information and links, that indicate your erroneous or non-factual claims are incorrect, is submitted, you merely elect not to publish them. Not only that Mr. moderator you elect to deny that you have taken that course of action... similarly and almost identically following the Twatter play book. There is a difference is of course. You cannot blame underlings due to the clearly stated proviso...
"Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author." You have also stated that it is your blog and you decide what is published.
You have also stated on line that you vote green although happy with Labor.
I did not say you hated Twitter or Musk (comprehension difficulty there, headmaster), merely that you must hate the actions taken by Musk in relation to reducing censorship of accounts. The offerings I put up that were not given light of day did not have insults, poor language or any of the editable content normally claimed as a reason for not publishing, but you deserve the slings given following such censorship.

Anonymous said...

I have seen how you moderate. If a comment with sound, factual information and links, that indicate your erroneous or non-factual claims are incorrect, is submitted, you merely elect not to publish them. Not only that Mr. moderator you elect to deny that you have taken that course of action... similarly and almost identically following the Twatter play book. There is a difference is of course. You cannot blame underlings due to the clearly stated proviso...
"Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author." You have also stated that it is your blog and you decide what is published.
You have also stated on line that you vote green although happy with Labor.
I did not say you hated Twitter or Musk (comprehension difficulty there, headmaster), merely that you must hate the actions taken by Musk in relation to reducing censorship of accounts. The offerings I put up that were not given light of day did not have insults, poor language or any of the editable content normally claimed as a reason for not publishing, but you deserve the slings given following such censorship..

1735099 said...

Rot. And you're repeating yourself....

Jetstar

Pic courtesy Jetstar I thought I had retired, gentle reader, but now I’m working for Jetstar. I haven’t flown with them for a while, and the...