Thursday, 26 May 2022

Home of the Craven, Land of the Shooting Spree

 

One representation of the problem. (Image courtesy gunviolencearchive.org)

Again, or still, kids are being slaughtered across the Pacific in their classrooms.

This, in what the conventional wisdom regards as a civilised country. If this is "civilisation", I shudder to think what an uncivilised community would look like.

These events are now routine, and I find it incomprehensible that US lawmakers allow it to happen. 

The lawmakers who continue to allow this to happen are craven cowards. Their constituents want tighter regulation, but they are terrified of the NRA.

We are reminded, gentle reader, of the cliches wheeled out after these events. It happens so often that I know them by heart -

Violence is as American as apple pie.

And

A good guy with a gun will always stop a bad guy with a gun.

And 

Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families.

And on it goes....

Meanwhile, the governor of the state where since 1966, twenty-two of these massacres (two of them in schools) have taken place, will address the NRA convention on Friday. Ironically perhaps, this convention will be a gun free zone.

He will speak on the same platform as the last President of the US, who on seven occasions during his administration intoned the "thoughts and prayers" cliche after similar massacres. That was all he did...

Image courtesy The Guardian

On a personal note, I find these events completely horrifying. As a lifetime teacher (and school principal) and a short time soldier, I probably have a unique perspective.

In Vietnam many years ago, I saw what rounds from a high powered long barrelled rifle do to the human body. That's what automatic rifles are designed to do, of course. They are, after all, killing machines. I carried one from February to December 1970.

I carried a rifle, because I was trained to kill enemy guerillas. I fervently hope the few shots I fired in the only major contact I was involved in didn't kill anyone. I'll never know. 

A soldier a few metres from me was wounded in a friendly fire incident on 13th March 1970. I know what it feels like to have 7.62mm rounds whistling around your ears. I shudder to think what small children would make of this. Those who survived will be changed for the rest of their lives.

Years later, as principal of a special school in North Queensland I was threatened with shooting by a grieving parent. He owned a rifle which was confiscated by the police when I reported the incident. At the time, I was grappling with the confronting possibility that myself and my staff would find ourselves in a situation where we were trying to protect a school full of children, most of whom were in wheelchairs.

In this country we confronted the problem in 1996, and semi-autos were removed from circulation. The sky didn't fall, and we continue to live in a free country. If I wanted to own a firearm (and God knows I don't - I was very happy to hand my SLR back to the armory in Nui Dat on 10th December 1970) I could, but I couldn't go down to my local gun shop and buy an AR-15 off the shelf.

In many states in the USA, once you are 18, you can.

I've spent time in the USA, and learned from that experience that in most respects, their culture is not dissimilar to ours. The one exception is their gun culture, which viewed dispassionately,  is a complete anachronism. The result in 2022 is that there are more guns than people in the USA.

That is the essence of the problem. It can be solved. Short-term, by a tightening of regulations so that all weapons must be licensed and all purchases are screened. Long-term, an amnesty (perhaps lasting at least years) should be implemented, with consequential amounts paid to gun owners. The USA also needs legislation resembling our National Firearm Agreement. Without it, the states whose culture remains bogged in the 1700s will always be feral. 

Perhaps, the best path to a solution lies in the highly developed plaintiff law structures in the USA. That has, in a small way, already commenced.

In the meantime, all we can do in Australia is watch what is happening across the Pacific, understanding that it represents a kind of cautionary tale. 

God help them...


Update - This is from Commonweal Magazine. It provides a balanced and Catholic perspective, and was written by someone whose life was changed through gun violence.


Comments closed.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Bobby, how about a short thesis on global, rather than on your much disliked US, firearms problems....you could start with some recently compiled figures....
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gun-deaths-by-country

When you are finished relate the firearms deaths to motor vehicle deaths...and then give some detail on the suicides by firearms deaths just to give the difference between murders and self inflicted shootings.

Here is another site that you may find interesting....
https://mass-shootings.info/statistics.php

Remember this one...After-a-shooting-spree-they-always-want-to-take-the-guns-away-from-the-people-who-didnt-do-it-william-burroughs-1992

And another...http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-deaths-and-injuries-statistics/

1735099 said...

Comparing like with like is always informative.
Comparing US gun deaths with those in third world countries isn't, unless you regard the US as a third world country. Perhaps in many aspects, it is.
Motor vehicle deaths in the US aren't related to an anachronistic clause in their constitution. They didn't have motor vehicles in 1791.
Your third link doesn't work.
And nor does the US constitution.
It kills kids in their classrooms.

Anonymous said...

Try this.....https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-violence-statistics/

1735099 said...

From the website you linked to -
America has the weakest gun laws and the most guns—393 million—of any comparable nation.
The US accounts for just 4% of the world’s population but 35% of global firearm suicides.
Americans are 25 times more likely to be killed in a gun homicide than people in other high-income countries.

The more guns held by the population, the less safe a country becomes....

Anonymous said...

The more guns held by the population, the less safe a country becomes..
If that were the case then Australia is less safe now than 1996 when the guns were taken from those who did not commit the offence blamed for the buy back scheme. There are now more guns in the community than there were then.

1735099 said...

If that were the case then Australia is less safe now than 1996 when the guns were taken
Except that the opposite is the case -https://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/5F71A98CD4A060C2CA256D350002F50A/$File/45100_2002.pdf
Check the graph on page 7 of the summary.

Anonymous said...

https://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/australia

Anonymous said...

Did you notice that "weapon" is not gun specific, and that a knife is the weapon of choice.
The source is not gun specific. Percentage quotes can also be very deceptive. Find the actual numbers. 1 is a number. If one is the total then it is also 100%.

Birds of a Feather

George Santos (Courtesy Wikipedia) Troy Thompson (Courtesy Townsville Bulletin)   Today, gentle reader, I'm comparing two individuals wh...