No doubt, gentle reader, you’re acquainted with both the media pile-on directed towards Ben Roberts-Smith, and the consequential outrage.
Taken in isolation, this situation is patently ridiculous, and it is unfair, given that the material that is the subject of the pile-on is subject to a confidential ADF inquiry.
The pile-on is of course, unreasonable and unfair to Roberts-Smith, but it is hardly a new phenomenon.
The similarities include the publishing of a whole range of allegations that grow one upon the other, are amplified and value-added in social media, and are scurrilous in the extreme.
There are, however, some differences, and they’re related to gender.
In the case of Husar and YAM, there is a characteristic of the pile-on that is salacious, and almost pornographic.
In the case of Roberts-Smith, the pornography is violence.
What this reveals is the mindset of those to whom this material appeals, and the level of gutter journalism in which many of our tabloids and shock jocks are prepared to operate.
Sad and shameful......